Re: [PATCH] e1000: Use time_after() for time comparison

2014-05-23 Thread Jeff Kirsher
On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 22:21 +0200, Manuel Schölling wrote: > To be future-proof and for better readability the time comparisons are > modified > to use time_after() instead of plain, error-prone math. > > Signed-off-by: Manuel Schölling > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c |

Re: [PATCH] e1000: Use time_after() for time comparison

2014-05-22 Thread David Miller
From: Manuel Schölling Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 22:21:30 +0200 > To be future-proof and for better readability the time comparisons are > modified > to use time_after() instead of plain, error-prone math. > > Signed-off-by: Manuel Schölling I'll let Jeff pick this up in his tree. -- To unsubscr

[PATCH] e1000: Use time_after() for time comparison

2014-05-22 Thread Manuel Schölling
To be future-proof and for better readability the time comparisons are modified to use time_after() instead of plain, error-prone math. Signed-off-by: Manuel Schölling --- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c |3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/dr