Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: fix Theobroma-System board bindings

2019-09-29 Thread Heiko Stuebner
Am Dienstag, 17. September 2019, 10:34:53 CEST schrieb Heiko Stuebner: > The naming convention for the existing Theobroma boards is > soc-q7module-baseboard, so rk3399-puma-haikou and the in-kernel > devicetrees also follow that scheme. > > For some reason in the binding a wrong or outdated naming

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: fix Theobroma-System board bindings

2019-09-17 Thread Rob Herring
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 3:35 AM Heiko Stuebner wrote: > > The naming convention for the existing Theobroma boards is > soc-q7module-baseboard, so rk3399-puma-haikou and the in-kernel > devicetrees also follow that scheme. > > For some reason in the binding a wrong or outdated naming slipped > in w

[PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: fix Theobroma-System board bindings

2019-09-17 Thread Heiko Stuebner
The naming convention for the existing Theobroma boards is soc-q7module-baseboard, so rk3399-puma-haikou and the in-kernel devicetrees also follow that scheme. For some reason in the binding a wrong or outdated naming slipped in which does not match the used devicetrees and makes the dt-schema com