Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Remove redundant 'maxItems'

2020-06-26 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 01:47:38PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > There's no need to specify 'maxItems' with the same value as the number > of entries in 'items'. A meta-schema update will catch future cases. Sounds reasonable, Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König -- Pengutronix e.K.

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Remove redundant 'maxItems'

2020-06-11 Thread Thierry Reding
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 01:47:38PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > There's no need to specify 'maxItems' with the same value as the number > of entries in 'items'. A meta-schema update will catch future cases. > > Cc: Stephen Boyd > Cc: Shawn Guo > Cc: Sascha Hauer > Cc: Thierry Reding > Cc: Anson

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Remove redundant 'maxItems'

2020-06-11 Thread Stephen Boyd
Quoting Rob Herring (2020-06-11 12:47:38) > There's no need to specify 'maxItems' with the same value as the number > of entries in 'items'. A meta-schema update will catch future cases. > > Cc: Stephen Boyd > Cc: Shawn Guo > Cc: Sascha Hauer > Cc: Thierry Reding > Cc: Anson Huang > Cc: linux

[PATCH] dt-bindings: Remove redundant 'maxItems'

2020-06-11 Thread Rob Herring
There's no need to specify 'maxItems' with the same value as the number of entries in 'items'. A meta-schema update will catch future cases. Cc: Stephen Boyd Cc: Shawn Guo Cc: Sascha Hauer Cc: Thierry Reding Cc: Anson Huang Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux