Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop kernel copy of common reserved-memory bindings

2023-10-24 Thread Rob Herring
On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 15:08:49 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > The common reserved-memory bindings have recently been copied from the > kernel tree into dtschema. The preference is to host common, stable > bindings in dtschema. As reserved-memory is documented in the DT Spec, > it meets the criteria. >

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop kernel copy of common reserved-memory bindings

2023-10-19 Thread kernel test robot
25913 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231013200851.347042-1-robh%40kernel.org patch subject: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop kernel copy of common reserved-memory bindings config: arm64-allyesconfig (https://downl

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop kernel copy of common reserved-memory bindings

2023-10-16 Thread Mathieu Poirier
On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 03:08:49PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > The common reserved-memory bindings have recently been copied from the > kernel tree into dtschema. The preference is to host common, stable > bindings in dtschema. As reserved-memory is documented in the DT Spec, > it meets the criteri

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop kernel copy of common reserved-memory bindings

2023-10-13 Thread Simon Glass
On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 at 13:45, Rob Herring wrote: > > The common reserved-memory bindings have recently been copied from the > kernel tree into dtschema. The preference is to host common, stable > bindings in dtschema. As reserved-memory is documented in the DT Spec, > it meets the criteria. > > Th

[PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop kernel copy of common reserved-memory bindings

2023-10-13 Thread Rob Herring
The common reserved-memory bindings have recently been copied from the kernel tree into dtschema. The preference is to host common, stable bindings in dtschema. As reserved-memory is documented in the DT Spec, it meets the criteria. The v2023.09 version of dtschema is what contains the reserved-me