Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: remove h from printk format specifier

2020-12-15 Thread Alex Deucher
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 10:11 AM Christian König wrote: > > Am 15.12.20 um 16:06 schrieb Tom Rix: > > On 12/15/20 6:47 AM, Christian König wrote: > >> Am 15.12.20 um 15:38 schrieb t...@redhat.com: > >>> From: Tom Rix > >>> > >>> See Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst. > >>> h should no lon

Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: remove h from printk format specifier

2020-12-15 Thread Christian König
Am 15.12.20 um 16:06 schrieb Tom Rix: On 12/15/20 6:47 AM, Christian König wrote: Am 15.12.20 um 15:38 schrieb t...@redhat.com: From: Tom Rix See Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst. h should no longer be used in the format specifier for printk. In general looks valid to me, but my que

Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: remove h from printk format specifier

2020-12-15 Thread Tom Rix
On 12/15/20 6:47 AM, Christian König wrote: > Am 15.12.20 um 15:38 schrieb t...@redhat.com: >> From: Tom Rix >> >> See Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst. >> h should no longer be used in the format specifier for printk. > > In general looks valid to me, but my question is how does that w

Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: remove h from printk format specifier

2020-12-15 Thread Christian König
Am 15.12.20 um 15:38 schrieb t...@redhat.com: From: Tom Rix See Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst. h should no longer be used in the format specifier for printk. In general looks valid to me, but my question is how does that work? I mean we specify h here because it is a short int. A

[PATCH] drm/amdgpu: remove h from printk format specifier

2020-12-15 Thread trix
From: Tom Rix See Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst. h should no longer be used in the format specifier for printk. Signed-off-by: Tom Rix --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vce.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vcn.c | 4 +