Re: [PATCH] drivers/virtio: delayed configuration descriptor flags

On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 01:02:52AM +0800, ni.liqiang wrote: > In our testing of the virtio hardware accelerator, we found that > configuring the flags of the descriptor after addr and len, > as implemented in DPDK, seems to be more friendly to the hardware. > > In our Virtio hardware implementatio

Re: [PATCH] drivers/virtio: delayed configuration descriptor flags

On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 1:27 AM ni.liqiang wrote: > > In our testing of the virtio hardware accelerator, we found that > configuring the flags of the descriptor after addr and len, > as implemented in DPDK, seems to be more friendly to the hardware. > > In our Virtio hardware implementation tests,

Re: [PATCH] drivers/virtio: delayed configuration descriptor flags

On 4/8/24 10:02, ni.liqiang wrote: > In our testing of the virtio hardware accelerator, we found that > configuring the flags of the descriptor after addr and len, > as implemented in DPDK, seems to be more friendly to the hardware. please describe in detail "friendly to the hardware" means .. > I

[PATCH] drivers/virtio: delayed configuration descriptor flags

In our testing of the virtio hardware accelerator, we found that configuring the flags of the descriptor after addr and len, as implemented in DPDK, seems to be more friendly to the hardware. In our Virtio hardware implementation tests, using the default open-source code, the hardware's bulk reads