Re: [PATCH] doc: process: GPL -> GPL-compatible

2019-02-01 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 10:34:08 +0100 Adam Borowski wrote: > Drivers under MIT, BSD-17-clause, or uncle-Bob's-newest-take-on-PD are > all fine, not just GPL. > > Signed-off-by: Adam Borowski > --- > Not reformatting to fill lines, it'll semi-conflict with another patch > that's been acked but not

Re: [PATCH] doc: process: GPL -> GPL-compatible

2019-01-22 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:34:08AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > Drivers under MIT, BSD-17-clause, or uncle-Bob's-newest-take-on-PD are > all fine, not just GPL. > > Signed-off-by: Adam Borowski > --- > Not reformatting to fill lines, it'll semi-conflict with another patch > that's been acked but

[PATCH] doc: process: GPL -> GPL-compatible

2019-01-22 Thread Adam Borowski
Drivers under MIT, BSD-17-clause, or uncle-Bob's-newest-take-on-PD are all fine, not just GPL. Signed-off-by: Adam Borowski --- Not reformatting to fill lines, it'll semi-conflict with another patch that's been acked but not yet pushed. Documentation/process/stable-api-nonsense.rst | 3 ++- 1 f