On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 08:57:41AM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 07:13:32AM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > How about this for telling that an architecture doesn't support DMA?
> > At least we could get rid of dma-mapping-broken.h and don't need to
> > compile some afterwar
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 07:13:32AM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> How about this for telling that an architecture doesn't support DMA?
> At least we could get rid of dma-mapping-broken.h and don't need to
> compile some afterwards dead code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
T
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 07:13:32AM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> How about this for telling that an architecture doesn't support DMA?
> At least we could get rid of dma-mapping-broken.h and don't need to
> compile some afterwards dead code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
How about this for telling that an architecture doesn't support DMA?
At least we could get rid of dma-mapping-broken.h and don't need to
compile some afterwards dead code.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/s390/Kconfig |3 +++
drivers/base/Makefile
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 07:59:45PM -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
> This allows some drivers compile on arches that don't support DMA
> (e.g. s390).
Which drivers are we talking about? Last time I checked an allmodconfig
just compiled.
I'd rather like to the opposite: rip out everything that depen
This allows some drivers compile on arches that don't support DMA
(e.g. s390).
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Is there any reason why this header should not cover the whole DMA API?
Compile-tested only...
include/asm-generic/dma-mapping-broken.h | 134 +
6 matches
Mail list logo
