On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 6:48 AM, Joe Thornber wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at 12:01:17AM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>> Also dm_cblock_t is uint32_t, but atomic_t changes that to int. You
>> should correct that to atomic64_t to preserve original semantics.
>
> atomic_t used to have only 24 bits of
On Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at 12:01:17AM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> Also dm_cblock_t is uint32_t, but atomic_t changes that to int. You
> should correct that to atomic64_t to preserve original semantics.
atomic_t used to have only 24 bits of range due to the Sparc
implementation holding a lock in one
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> On 08/03/2014 12:57 AM, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>> On 08/03/2014 12:46 AM, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>>> On 08/02/2014 10:10 PM, Pranith Kumar wrote:
Corrently adding Anssi this time.
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Pranith Kumar
>>>
On 08/03/2014 12:57 AM, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> On 08/03/2014 12:46 AM, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>> On 08/02/2014 10:10 PM, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>>> Corrently adding Anssi this time.
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Pranith Kumar
>>> wrote:
Hello Anssi, Joe, Mike,
I just found y
On 08/03/2014 12:46 AM, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> On 08/02/2014 10:10 PM, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>> Corrently adding Anssi this time.
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>>> Hello Anssi, Joe, Mike,
>>>
>>> I just found your patch in the latest rc and wanted to ask a few
>>> ques
On 08/02/2014 10:10 PM, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> Corrently adding Anssi this time.
>
> On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>> Hello Anssi, Joe, Mike,
>>
>> I just found your patch in the latest rc and wanted to ask a few
>> questions. I am not sure how this patch helps at all othe
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 11:33 PM, Anssi Hannula wrote:
> 03.08.2014, 05:10, Pranith Kumar kirjoitti:
>> Corrently adding Anssi this time.
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>>> Hello Anssi, Joe, Mike,
>
> Hi,
>
>>> I just found your patch in the latest rc and wanted to ask
03.08.2014, 05:10, Pranith Kumar kirjoitti:
> Corrently adding Anssi this time.
>
> On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>> Hello Anssi, Joe, Mike,
Hi,
>> I just found your patch in the latest rc and wanted to ask a few
>> questions. I am not sure how this patch helps at all ot
Corrently adding Anssi this time.
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> Hello Anssi, Joe, Mike,
>
> I just found your patch in the latest rc and wanted to ask a few
> questions. I am not sure how this patch helps at all other than luck in
> that dm_cblock_t type is of type int32
Correctly adding Anssi this time.
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> Hello Anssi, Joe, Mike,
>
> I just found your patch in the latest rc and wanted to ask a few
> questions. I am not sure how this patch helps at all other than luck in
> that dm_cblock_t type is of type int32
Hello Anssi, Joe, Mike,
I just found your patch in the latest rc and wanted to ask a few
questions. I am not sure how this patch helps at all other than luck in
that dm_cblock_t type is of type int32_t, which should guarantee that it
is atomic on most platforms. Which begs the question, what platf
11 matches
Mail list logo