From: Steven Whitehouse
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 09:37:56 +0100
> However, I'm not overly worried and we'll soon know if it will cause any
> problems or not,
You can be sure that if we get real bug reports due to this change, I will
revert it back to how it was before.
--
To unsubscribe from this
Hi,
On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 15:57 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Steven Whitehouse
> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:16:41 +0100
>
> > On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 22:37 -0400, Xi Wang wrote:
> >> The allowed value of "how" is SHUT_RD/SHUT_WR/SHUT_RDWR (0/1/2),
> >> rather than SHUTDOWN_MASK (3).
> >>
> >
From: Steven Whitehouse
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:16:41 +0100
> On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 22:37 -0400, Xi Wang wrote:
>> The allowed value of "how" is SHUT_RD/SHUT_WR/SHUT_RDWR (0/1/2),
>> rather than SHUTDOWN_MASK (3).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xi Wang
> Acked-by: Steven Whitehouse
Applied to net-nex
On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 22:37 -0400, Xi Wang wrote:
> The allowed value of "how" is SHUT_RD/SHUT_WR/SHUT_RDWR (0/1/2),
> rather than SHUTDOWN_MASK (3).
>
> Signed-off-by: Xi Wang
Acked-by: Steven Whitehouse
Although it could be argued that we should also continue to accept the
value 3 just in ca
The allowed value of "how" is SHUT_RD/SHUT_WR/SHUT_RDWR (0/1/2),
rather than SHUTDOWN_MASK (3).
Signed-off-by: Xi Wang
---
net/decnet/af_decnet.c |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/decnet/af_decnet.c b/net/decnet/af_decnet.c
index 2ba1a28..307c322 1006
5 matches
Mail list logo