Re: [PATCH] ddr: Use less generic identifiers

2015-06-20 Thread santosh.shilim...@oracle.com
On 6/20/15 1:46 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: Am 04.05.2015 um 20:44 schrieb Richard Weinberger: Am 04.01.2015 um 16:48 schrieb Richard Weinberger: At least on UML this identifiers clash with register names. Use something less generic than Rx, Cx and Cx. CC lib//jedec_ddr_data.o In f

Re: [PATCH] ddr: Use less generic identifiers

2015-06-20 Thread Richard Weinberger
Am 04.05.2015 um 20:44 schrieb Richard Weinberger: > Am 04.01.2015 um 16:48 schrieb Richard Weinberger: >> At least on UML this identifiers clash with register names. >> Use something less generic than Rx, Cx and Cx. >> >> CC lib//jedec_ddr_data.o >> In file included from ./arch/um/include/a

Re: [PATCH] ddr: Use less generic identifiers

2015-05-04 Thread Richard Weinberger
Am 04.01.2015 um 16:48 schrieb Richard Weinberger: > At least on UML this identifiers clash with register names. > Use something less generic than Rx, Cx and Cx. > > CC lib//jedec_ddr_data.o > In file included from ./arch/um/include/asm/ptrace-generic.h:11:0, > from ./arch/

Re: [PATCH] ddr: Use less generic identifiers

2015-01-16 Thread Richard Weinberger
Am 04.01.2015 um 16:48 schrieb Richard Weinberger: > At least on UML this identifiers clash with register names. > Use something less generic than Rx, Cx and Cx. > > CC lib//jedec_ddr_data.o > In file included from ./arch/um/include/asm/ptrace-generic.h:11:0, > from ./arch/

[PATCH] ddr: Use less generic identifiers

2015-01-04 Thread Richard Weinberger
At least on UML this identifiers clash with register names. Use something less generic than Rx, Cx and Cx. CC lib//jedec_ddr_data.o In file included from ./arch/um/include/asm/ptrace-generic.h:11:0, from ./arch/x86/um/asm/ptrace.h:8, from ./arch/x86/include