[PATCH] dcache: trivial comment fix

2007-10-16 Thread J. Bruce Fields
From: J. Bruce Fields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> As it stands this comment is confusing, and not quite grammatical. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- fs/dcache.c |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c index 7da0cf5..566

Re: [PATCH] dcache: trivial comment fix

2007-09-11 Thread J. Bruce Fields
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 07:33:43PM +0200, Neil Brown wrote: > On Monday September 10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 02:46:32PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > * This forceful removal will result in ugly /proc output if > > > * somebody holds a file open that got delet

Re: [PATCH] dcache: trivial comment fix

2007-09-11 Thread Neil Brown
On Monday September 10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 02:46:32PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > * This forceful removal will result in ugly /proc output if > > * somebody holds a file open that got deleted due to a rename. > > * We could be nicer about the deleted file

Re: [PATCH] dcache: trivial comment fix

2007-09-10 Thread J. Bruce Fields
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 02:46:32PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > * This forceful removal will result in ugly /proc output if > * somebody holds a file open that got deleted due to a rename. > * We could be nicer about the deleted file, and let it show > - * up under the name it got deleted

[PATCH] dcache: trivial comment fix

2007-09-10 Thread J. Bruce Fields
As it stands this comment is confusing, and not quite grammatical. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- fs/dcache.c |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c index 678d39d..2bacdf6 100644 --- a/fs/dcache.c +++ b/fs/dcac