Re: [PATCH] dax: include bus.h for definition of run_dax()

Ben Dooks wrote: > The run_dax() prototype is defined in "bus.h" but drivers/dax/super.c > does not include this. Include bus.h to silece the following sparse > warning: > > drivers/dax/super.c:337:6: warning: symbol 'run_dax' was not declared. Should > it be static? A different version of this

[PATCH] dax: include bus.h for definition of run_dax()

The run_dax() prototype is defined in "bus.h" but drivers/dax/super.c does not include this. Include bus.h to silece the following sparse warning: drivers/dax/super.c:337:6: warning: symbol 'run_dax' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks --- drivers/dax/super.c | 1 +