Re: [PATCH] cxl: Don't remove AFUs/vPHBs in cxl_reset

2015-09-28 Thread Daniel Axtens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, Yep, this is OK. It broke because vPHB support was added in 4.2. The commit message and title are technically slightly wrong as there are no vPHBs, but I don't think that's serious. Thanks Sudip! Regards, Daniel Sudip Mukherjee writes: >

Re: [PATCH] cxl: Don't remove AFUs/vPHBs in cxl_reset

2015-09-27 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 12:18:41PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > From: Daniel Axtens > > commit 4e1efb403c1c016ae831bd9988a7d2e5e0af41a0 upstream. > > If the driver doesn't participate in EEH, the AFUs will be removed > by cxl_remove, which will be invoked by EEH. > > If the driver does parti

[PATCH] cxl: Don't remove AFUs/vPHBs in cxl_reset

2015-09-26 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
From: Daniel Axtens commit 4e1efb403c1c016ae831bd9988a7d2e5e0af41a0 upstream. If the driver doesn't participate in EEH, the AFUs will be removed by cxl_remove, which will be invoked by EEH. If the driver does particpate in EEH, the vPHB needs to stick around so that the it can particpate. In b