Re: [PATCH] cramfs: better MTD dependency expression

2018-02-08 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Thu, 8 Feb 2018, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 7:08 PM, Nicolas Pitre > wrote: > > > > Viro once told me that my cramfs pull requests could go either to him or > > to you. I have only this one patch at the moment, and since it depends > > on a commit that recently appeared in

Re: [PATCH] cramfs: better MTD dependency expression

2018-02-08 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 02/08/2018 11:38 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 7:08 PM, Nicolas Pitre > wrote: >> >> Viro once told me that my cramfs pull requests could go either to him or >> to you. I have only this one patch at the moment, and since it depends >> on a commit that recently appeared in

Re: [PATCH] cramfs: better MTD dependency expression

2018-02-08 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 7:08 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > Viro once told me that my cramfs pull requests could go either to him or > to you. I have only this one patch at the moment, and since it depends > on a commit that recently appeared in your tree I'm therefore sending it > directly to you.

[PATCH] cramfs: better MTD dependency expression

2018-02-07 Thread Nicolas Pitre
Commit b9f5fb1800d8 ("cramfs: fix MTD dependency") did what it says. Since commit 9059a3493efe ("kconfig: fix relational operators for bool and tristate symbols") it is possible to do it slightly better though. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre --- Linus, Viro once told me that my cramfs pull reques