Re: [PATCH] cpumask: remove __first_cpu / __next_cpu

2015-04-16 Thread David Miller
From: Rusty Russell Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 14:13:32 +0930 > [ Final grep before push to Linus revealed sparc used these directly, > please Ack. Against my cpumask-next tree. ] > > They were for use by the deprecated first_cpu() and next_cpu() wrappers, > but sparc used them directly. > > The

[PATCH] cpumask: remove __first_cpu / __next_cpu

2015-04-15 Thread Rusty Russell
[ Final grep before push to Linus revealed sparc used these directly, please Ack. Against my cpumask-next tree. ] They were for use by the deprecated first_cpu() and next_cpu() wrappers, but sparc used them directly. They're now replaced by cpumask_first / cpumask_next. And __next_cpu_nr is c