On 6 March 2014 09:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 04, 2014 12:42:15 PM Aaron Plattner wrote:
>> If a module calls cpufreq_get while cpufreq is initializing, it's possible
>> for
>> it to be called after cpufreq_driver is set but before cpufreq_cpu_data is
>> written during subsy
On Wednesday, March 05, 2014 05:14:26 PM Aaron Plattner wrote:
> On 03/05/14 17:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, March 04, 2014 12:42:15 PM Aaron Plattner wrote:
> >> If a module calls cpufreq_get while cpufreq is initializing, it's possible
> >> for
> >> it to be called after cpufreq_
On 03/05/14 17:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, March 04, 2014 12:42:15 PM Aaron Plattner wrote:
If a module calls cpufreq_get while cpufreq is initializing, it's possible for
it to be called after cpufreq_driver is set but before cpufreq_cpu_data is
written during subsys_interface_regis
On Tuesday, March 04, 2014 12:42:15 PM Aaron Plattner wrote:
> If a module calls cpufreq_get while cpufreq is initializing, it's possible for
> it to be called after cpufreq_driver is set but before cpufreq_cpu_data is
> written during subsys_interface_register. This happens because cpufreq_get
>
If a module calls cpufreq_get while cpufreq is initializing, it's possible for
it to be called after cpufreq_driver is set but before cpufreq_cpu_data is
written during subsys_interface_register. This happens because cpufreq_get
doesn't take the cpufreq_driver_lock around its use of cpufreq_cpu_da
5 matches
Mail list logo