On Thursday, August 6, 2020 7:54:47 AM CEST Doug Smythies wrote:
> On 2020.08.03 10:09 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Sunday, August 2, 2020 5:17:39 PM CEST Doug Smythies wrote:
> > > On 2020.07.19 04:43 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 3:37 PM Doug Smythies
> > > > wrote
On 2020.08.03 10:09 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, August 2, 2020 5:17:39 PM CEST Doug Smythies wrote:
> > On 2020.07.19 04:43 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 3:37 PM Doug Smythies wrote:
> > > > On 2020.07.16 05:08 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2
On Sunday, August 2, 2020 5:17:39 PM CEST Doug Smythies wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On 2020.07.19 04:43 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 3:37 PM Doug Smythies wrote:
> > > On 2020.07.16 05:08 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 10:39 PM Doug Smythies
> > > >
Hi Rafael,
On 2020.07.19 04:43 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 3:37 PM Doug Smythies wrote:
> > On 2020.07.16 05:08 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 10:39 PM Doug Smythies
> > > wrote:
> > >> On 2020.07.14 11:16 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >
"Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
> On Thursday, July 30, 2020 2:49:34 AM CEST Francisco Jerez wrote:
>>
>
> [cut]
>
>> >> >
>> >> >> >> No, I explicitly dismissed that in my previous reply.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > But at the same time you seem to agree that without the non-CPU com=
>> pon=3D
>> >> ent
On Thursday, July 30, 2020 2:49:34 AM CEST Francisco Jerez wrote:
>
[cut]
> >> >
> >> >> >> No, I explicitly dismissed that in my previous reply.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > But at the same time you seem to agree that without the non-CPU com=
> pon=3D
> >> ent
> >> >> > (or thermal pressure) the existin
"Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
> On Wednesday, July 29, 2020 7:46:08 AM CEST Francisco Jerez wrote:
>>
>> --==-=-=
>> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-="
>>
>> --=-=-=
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>> Content-Disposition: inline
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printab
On Wednesday, July 29, 2020 7:46:08 AM CEST Francisco Jerez wrote:
>
> --==-=-=
> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-="
>
> --=-=-=
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
>
"Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
> On Tuesday, July 28, 2020 4:32:22 AM CEST Francisco Jerez wrote:
>>
>> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
>>
>> > On Tuesday, July 21, 2020 1:20:14 AM CEST Francisco Jerez wrote:
>> >
>> > [cut]
>> >
>> >> >
>> >> > However, in the active mode the only updater of hwp_req_
On Tuesday, July 28, 2020 4:32:22 AM CEST Francisco Jerez wrote:
>
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
>
> > On Tuesday, July 21, 2020 1:20:14 AM CEST Francisco Jerez wrote:
> >
> > [cut]
> >
> >> >
> >> > However, in the active mode the only updater of hwp_req_cached is
> >> > intel_pstate_hwp_set() a
On Tuesday, July 21, 2020 1:20:14 AM CEST Francisco Jerez wrote:
>
[cut]
> > If there is a bug, then what exactly is it, from the users' perspective?
> >
>
> It can be reproduced easily as follows:
>
> | echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/hwp_dynamic_boost
> | for p in
> /sys/devic
"Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
> On Tuesday, July 21, 2020 1:20:14 AM CEST Francisco Jerez wrote:
>
> [cut]
>
>> >
>> > However, in the active mode the only updater of hwp_req_cached is
>> > intel_pstate_hwp_set() and this patch doesn't introduce any
>> > differences in behavior in that case.
>> >
>
On Wednesday, July 22, 2020 1:14:42 AM CEST Francisco Jerez wrote:
>
> --==-=-=
> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-="
>
> --=-=-=
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> Srinivas Pandruvada writes:
>
On Tuesday, July 21, 2020 1:20:14 AM CEST Francisco Jerez wrote:
[cut]
> >
> > However, in the active mode the only updater of hwp_req_cached is
> > intel_pstate_hwp_set() and this patch doesn't introduce any
> > differences in behavior in that case.
> >
>
> intel_pstate_hwp_set() is the only up
Srinivas Pandruvada writes:
> On Mon, 2020-07-20 at 16:20 -0700, Francisco Jerez wrote:
>> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 2:21 AM Francisco Jerez <
>> > curroje...@riseup.net> wrote:
>> > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
>> > >
> {...]
>
>> > Overall, so far, I'm see
On Mon, 2020-07-20 at 16:20 -0700, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 2:21 AM Francisco Jerez <
> > curroje...@riseup.net> wrote:
> > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
> > >
{...]
> > Overall, so far, I'm seeing a claim that the CPU subsystem can be
"Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 2:21 AM Francisco Jerez wrote:
>>
>> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
>>
>> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 11:35 PM Francisco Jerez
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
>> >>
>> >> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 2:09 AM Francisco Jerez
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 2:21 AM Francisco Jerez wrote:
>
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 11:35 PM Francisco Jerez
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
> >>
> >> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 2:09 AM Francisco Jerez
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> "Rafael J.
Hi Doug,
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 3:37 PM Doug Smythies wrote:
>
> Hi Rafael,
>
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> On 2020.07.16 05:08 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 10:39 PM Doug Smythies wrote:
> >> On 2020.07.14 11:16 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> >
> >> > From: Rafael J. Wy
Hi Rafael,
Thank you for your reply.
On 2020.07.16 05:08 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 10:39 PM Doug Smythies wrote:
>> On 2020.07.14 11:16 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> >
>> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>> ...
>> > Since the passive mode hasn't worked with HWP at all, and it is
"Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 11:35 PM Francisco Jerez
> wrote:
>>
>> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
>>
>> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 2:09 AM Francisco Jerez
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
>> >>
>> >> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>> >> >
>> >> > Allow
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 3:14 AM Srinivas Pandruvada
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2020-07-15 at 14:35 -0700, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> > "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 2:09 AM Francisco Jerez <
> > > curroje...@riseup.net> wrote:
> > > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
> > > >
> >
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 11:35 PM Francisco Jerez wrote:
>
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 2:09 AM Francisco Jerez
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
> >>
> >> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> >> >
> >> > Allow intel_pstate to work in the passive mode with
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 10:39 PM Doug Smythies wrote:
>
> On 2020.07.14 11:16 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> ...
> > Since the passive mode hasn't worked with HWP at all, and it is not going to
> > the default for HWP systems anyway, I don't see any drawbacks related t
On Wed, 2020-07-15 at 14:35 -0700, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 2:09 AM Francisco Jerez <
> > curroje...@riseup.net> wrote:
> > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
> > >
> > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> > > >
[...]
> > > > I don't think that'
"Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 2:09 AM Francisco Jerez wrote:
>>
>> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
>>
>> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>> >
>> > Allow intel_pstate to work in the passive mode with HWP enabled and
>> > make it set the HWP minimum performance limit (HWP floor) to
On 2020.07.14 11:16 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
...
> Since the passive mode hasn't worked with HWP at all, and it is not going to
> the default for HWP systems anyway, I don't see any drawbacks related to
> making
> this change, so I would consider this as 5.9 material
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 2:09 AM Francisco Jerez wrote:
>
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
>
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> >
> > Allow intel_pstate to work in the passive mode with HWP enabled and
> > make it set the HWP minimum performance limit (HWP floor) to the
> > P-state value given by the tar
"Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> Allow intel_pstate to work in the passive mode with HWP enabled and
> make it set the HWP minimum performance limit (HWP floor) to the
> P-state value given by the target frequency supplied by the cpufreq
> governor, so as to prevent the
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Allow intel_pstate to work in the passive mode with HWP enabled and
make it set the HWP minimum performance limit (HWP floor) to the
P-state value given by the target frequency supplied by the cpufreq
governor, so as to prevent the HWP algorithm and the CPU scheduler
from
30 matches
Mail list logo