On 17-11-16, 10:38, Markus Mayer wrote:
> No, because I am trying to find the lowest frequency that doesn't
> require safe mode and it's looping through the table from highest to
> lowest. So there could still be a lower frequency after the current
> one that doesn't require safe mode.
>
> What I
On 17 November 2016 at 01:02, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 10-11-16, 15:56, Markus Mayer wrote:
>> From: Markus Mayer
>>
>> This CPUfreq driver provides basic frequency scaling for older Broadcom
>> STB SoCs that do not use AVS firmware with DVFS support. There is no
>> support for voltage scaling.
>
On 10-11-16, 15:56, Markus Mayer wrote:
> From: Markus Mayer
>
> This CPUfreq driver provides basic frequency scaling for older Broadcom
> STB SoCs that do not use AVS firmware with DVFS support. There is no
> support for voltage scaling.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Mayer
> ---
>
> This patch is
On 10 November 2016 at 22:14, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Markus,
>
> [auto build test ERROR on pm/linux-next]
> [also build test ERROR on next-20161110]
> [cannot apply to v4.9-rc4]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to
> help improve the system]
>
> url:
Hi Markus,
[auto build test ERROR on pm/linux-next]
[also build test ERROR on next-20161110]
[cannot apply to v4.9-rc4]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Markus-Mayer/cpufreq-brcmst
From: Markus Mayer
This CPUfreq driver provides basic frequency scaling for older Broadcom
STB SoCs that do not use AVS firmware with DVFS support. There is no
support for voltage scaling.
Signed-off-by: Markus Mayer
---
This patch is based on Rafael's "bleeding-edge" branch.
drivers/cpufreq
6 matches
Mail list logo
