On 08/27/13 23:34, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 28 August 2013 03:31, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
>> b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
>> index b9b20fd..523af48 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
On 28 August 2013 03:31, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> index b9b20fd..523af48 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ void gov_queue_work(str
Workqueues are preemptible even if works are queued on them with
queue_work_on(). Let's just use the policy->cpu argument here
instead of using smp_processor_id() to silence the warning.
BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [] code: kworker/3:2/674
caller is gov_queue_work+0x28/0xb
3 matches
Mail list logo