"Barry K. Nathan" wrote:
>
> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> > Alan Cox wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > > ia32 is an intel trademark. Using it for non intel products is probably an
> > > actionable matter ..
> > >
> >
> > Yet another reason to ignore it.
>
> Speaking of using it for non-Intel products, thi
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
[snip]
> > ia32 is an intel trademark. Using it for non intel products is probably an
> > actionable matter ..
> >
>
> Yet another reason to ignore it.
Speaking of using it for non-Intel products, this is a line from
Documentation/Changes in Linux 2.4.
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > > True enough, personally I prefer "x86".
> >
> > ia32 is the official name. OTOH, i[3-6]86 _are_ different beasts...
>
> ia32 is an intel trademark. Using it for non intel products is probably an
> actionable matter ..
>
Yet another reason to ignore it.
-hpa
--
> > True enough, personally I prefer "x86".
>
> ia32 is the official name. OTOH, i[3-6]86 _are_ different beasts...
ia32 is an intel trademark. Using it for non intel products is probably an
actionable matter ..
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the bo
Horst von Brand wrote:
>
> "H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>said:
> > Alan Cox wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > > We should never have used anything but "i386" as the utsname... sigh.
>
> > > Its questionable if we should include the 'i'
>
> > True enough, personally I prefer "x86".
>
> ia32 is t
"H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>said:
> Alan Cox wrote:
[...]
> > > We should never have used anything but "i386" as the utsname... sigh.
> > Its questionable if we should include the 'i'
> True enough, personally I prefer "x86".
ia32 is the official name. OTOH, i[3-6]86 _are_ different b
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > > - make Pentium IV and other post-P6 processors use the "i686"
> > > family name (same fix as the system_utsname.machine init fix
> > > which went into include/asm-i386/bugs.h in test10-pre4)
> > >
> >
> > We should never have used anything but "i386" as the utsna
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > > - make Pentium IV and other post-P6 processors use the "i686"
> > > family name (same fix as the system_utsname.machine init fix
> > > which went into include/asm-i386/bugs.h in test10-pre4)
> > >
> >
> > We should never have used anything but "i386" as the utsna
> > - make Pentium IV and other post-P6 processors use the "i686"
> > family name (same fix as the system_utsname.machine init fix
> > which went into include/asm-i386/bugs.h in test10-pre4)
> >
>
> We should never have used anything but "i386" as the utsname... sigh.
Its questionable
Hi!
> >> > * include/asm-i386/elf.h:
> >> > - make Pentium IV and other post-P6 processors use the "i686"
> >> > family name (same fix as the system_utsname.machine init fix
> >> > which went into include/asm-i386/bugs.h in test10-pre4)
> >> >
> >>
> >> We should never have used anyth
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> > * include/asm-i386/elf.h:
>> > - make Pentium IV and other post-P6 processors use the "i686"
>> > family name (same fix as the system_utsname.machine init fix
>> > which went into include/asm-i386/bugs.h in test10-pre4)
>> >
>>
>> We shoul
Hi!
> > * include/asm-i386/elf.h:
> > - make Pentium IV and other post-P6 processors use the "i686"
> > family name (same fix as the system_utsname.machine init fix
> > which went into include/asm-i386/bugs.h in test10-pre4)
> >
>
> We should never have used anything but "i386" as the
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:Mikael Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> * include/asm-i386/elf.h:
> - make Pentium IV and other post-P6 processors use the "i686"
> family name (same fix as the system_utsname.machine init fix
> which went
This patch should fix the Pentium IV and other CPU detection
glitches which remain in test10-pre4.
The necessary fixes are:
* arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:
- (Pentium IV) don't goto name_decoded, return instead; otherwise
x86_model_id which was grabbed from the extended cpuid levels
will be
14 matches
Mail list logo
