Hi Joel,
> On Dec 30, 2015, at 01:00 , Joel Becker wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 03:51:10PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> From: Pantelis Antoniou
>>
>> ConfigFS lacked binary attributes up until now. This patch
>> introduces support for binary attributes in a somewhat similar
>> mann
W dniu 2015-12-24 o 15:51, Christoph Hellwig pisze:
From: Pantelis Antoniou
ConfigFS lacked binary attributes up until now. This patch
introduces support for binary attributes in a somewhat similar
manner of sysfs binary attributes albeit with changes that
fit the configfs usage model.
Probl
W dniu 2015-12-30 o 00:00, Joel Becker pisze:
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 03:51:10PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> From: Pantelis Antoniou
>>
>> ConfigFS lacked binary attributes up until now. This patch
>> introduces support for binary attributes in a somewhat similar
>> manner of sysfs bin
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 03:51:10PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> From: Pantelis Antoniou
>
> ConfigFS lacked binary attributes up until now. This patch
> introduces support for binary attributes in a somewhat similar
> manner of sysfs binary attributes albeit with changes that
> fit the confi
From: Pantelis Antoniou
ConfigFS lacked binary attributes up until now. This patch
introduces support for binary attributes in a somewhat similar
manner of sysfs binary attributes albeit with changes that
fit the configfs usage model.
Problems that configfs binary attributes fix are everything t
Hi Christoph,
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 03:31:42PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> I have two fixes in the topic/overlays branch of renesas-drivers.git:
>
> Does thus mean you already have the patch queued up for Linus?
No, this is ju
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 03:31:42PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> I have two fixes in the topic/overlays branch of renesas-drivers.git:
Does thus mean you already have the patch queued up for Linus?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a me
Hi Geert,
> On Dec 18, 2015, at 16:31 , Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> Hi Christoph,
>
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
> wrote:
>>> On Dec 18, 2015, at 13:26 , Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 01:21:39PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
It???
Hi Christoph,
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
wrote:
>> On Dec 18, 2015, at 13:26 , Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 01:21:39PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>>> It???s on my TODO list for the holiday break.
>>>
>>> It is not dropped, just /me swamped
Hi Christoph,
> On Dec 18, 2015, at 13:26 , Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 01:21:39PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> It???s on my TODO list for the holiday break.
>>
>> It is not dropped, just /me swamped.
>
> I'm happy to take over the patch, but the real important p
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 01:21:39PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> It???s on my TODO list for the holiday break.
>
> It is not dropped, just /me swamped.
I'm happy to take over the patch, but the real important part is
to have in a shared repository where you and I can use it. For that
we'll n
Hi Christoph,
> On Dec 18, 2015, at 13:20 , Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> Joel, Andrew,
>
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 10:21:24AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> what's the state of this patch? I'll need it for some work I plan to
>> merge for 4.5 as well, so getting it into a stable repository
Joel, Andrew,
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 10:21:24AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> what's the state of this patch? I'll need it for some work I plan to
> merge for 4.5 as well, so getting it into a stable repository we could
> both base off would be nice.
>
> Talking about that, I'd be happy to
Hi Pantelis,
what's the state of this patch? I'll need it for some work I plan to
merge for 4.5 as well, so getting it into a stable repository we could
both base off would be nice.
Talking about that, I'd be happy to volunteer maintaining a configfs
tree as the current split over -mm and the ta
ConfigFS lacked binary attributes up until now. This patch
introduces support for binary attributes in a somewhat similar
manner of sysfs binary attributes albeit with changes that
fit the configfs usage model.
Problems that configfs binary attributes fix are everything that
requires a binary blob
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 09:29:35AM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Yes, indeed this is interesting.
>
> I could rebase on-top of your tree and try to make things simpler.
> Do you mind if you carry the binary attribute patch along when you post
> yours?
Sure, I can do that.
--
To unsubscribe fr
Hi Christoph,
> On Sep 17, 2015, at 03:37 , Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> Hi Pantelis,
>
> can you check if your patches become simpler on top of the changes
> in this tree:
>
> http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/block.git/shortlog/refs/heads/configfs.2
>
> I recently started using configfs an
Hi Pantelis,
can you check if your patches become simpler on top of the changes
in this tree:
http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/block.git/shortlog/refs/heads/configfs.2
I recently started using configfs and came up with this to avoid
the gigantic amounts of boilerplate code required for configf
ConfigFS lacked binary attributes up until now. This patch
introduces support for binary attributes in a somewhat similar
manner of sysfs binary attributes albeit with changes that
fit the configfs usage model.
Problems that configfs binary attributes fix are everything that
requires a binary blob
Pantelis Antoniou konsulko.com> writes:
...
> +static ssize_t
> +configfs_write_bin_file(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
> + size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> +{
...
> + len = simple_write_to_buffer(buffer->bin_buffer,
> + buffer->bin_buffer_size
Hi Greg,
> On Oct 29, 2014, at 04:54 , Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:30:32PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> ConfigFS lacked binary attributes up until now. This patch
>> introduces support for binary attributes in a somewhat similar
>> manner of sysfs binary att
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:30:32PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> ConfigFS lacked binary attributes up until now. This patch
> introduces support for binary attributes in a somewhat similar
> manner of sysfs binary attributes albeit with changes that
> fit the configfs usage model.
>
> Problems
ConfigFS lacked binary attributes up until now. This patch
introduces support for binary attributes in a somewhat similar
manner of sysfs binary attributes albeit with changes that
fit the configfs usage model.
Problems that configfs binary attributes fix are everything that
requires a binary blob
23 matches
Mail list logo
