On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 04:36:55PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Russell,
>
> On 12 February 2016 at 00:57, Akshay Bhat wrote:
> > Daniel Stone collabora.com> writes:
> >> Fixes: ffc30b74fd6d01588bd3fdebc3b1acc0857e6fc8
> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone collabora.com>
> >
> > Tested-by: Akshay Bh
Russell,
On 12 February 2016 at 00:57, Akshay Bhat wrote:
> Daniel Stone collabora.com> writes:
>> Fixes: ffc30b74fd6d01588bd3fdebc3b1acc0857e6fc8
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone collabora.com>
>
> Tested-by: Akshay Bhat
>
> Tested on imx6 processor based board where re-probe was broken after a
Daniel Stone collabora.com> writes:
>
> Fixes: ffc30b74fd6d01588bd3fdebc3b1acc0857e6fc8
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone collabora.com>
Tested-by: Akshay Bhat
Tested on imx6 processor based board where re-probe was broken after a
probe deferral.
Calling component_add() may result in the completion of a set of
devices, which will try to bring up a master. In bringing the master
up, we populate its match array with the current set of children.
If binding any of the devices fails, component_add() itself will fail,
free the struct component e
4 matches
Mail list logo