I'm curious why you used emc_mux as the parent clock? (I don't really
understand why this clock exists, and my EMC series removes it). Using
'emc' would be compatible with the EMC series :)
A minor one: the MC clock should probably be always enabled.
Apart from these:
Reviewed-by: Mikko Pertt
On 08/01/2014 06:09 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
From: Thierry Reding
The memory controller clock runs either at half or the same frequency as
the EMC clock.
Very quickly,
Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a mes
From: Thierry Reding
The memory controller clock runs either at half or the same frequency as
the EMC clock.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding
---
Changes in v2:
- split registration into a separate function that can be reused for all
SoC generations, but pass in the name and parent parameters fo
On 07/29/2014 08:17 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
From: Thierry Reding
The memory controller clock runs either at half or the same frequency as
the EMC clock.
The changes to *.c look basically identical. Is there a shared file
where the MC clock can be defined to avoid duplication?
Other than
From: Thierry Reding
The memory controller clock runs either at half or the same frequency as
the EMC clock.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding
---
drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra114.c | 15 ++-
drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra124.c | 15 ++-
drivers/clk/tegra/clk-teg
5 matches
Mail list logo
