Re: [PATCH] clk: samsung: Suppress unbinding to prevent theoretical attacks

Hi, 2016-05-17 16:26 GMT+09:00 Krzysztof Kozlowski : > Although unbinding a driver requires root privileges but it still might > be used theoretically in certain attacks (by triggering NULL pointer > exception or memory corruption if driver does not provide proper remove > callbacks or core does n

Re: [PATCH] clk: samsung: Suppress unbinding to prevent theoretical attacks

Hello Krzysztof, On 05/17/2016 03:26 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Although unbinding a driver requires root privileges but it still might > be used theoretically in certain attacks (by triggering NULL pointer > exception or memory corruption if driver does not provide proper remove > callbacks

[PATCH] clk: samsung: Suppress unbinding to prevent theoretical attacks

Although unbinding a driver requires root privileges but it still might be used theoretically in certain attacks (by triggering NULL pointer exception or memory corruption if driver does not provide proper remove callbacks or core does not handle it). Samsung clock drivers are essential for system