Re: [PATCH] clk: respect the clock dependencies in of_clk_init

2014-02-07 Thread Sebastian Hesselbarth
On 02/07/2014 03:49 PM, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: On 07/02/2014 15:43, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 09:24:30AM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote: On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:06:08AM -0300, Emilio López wrote: [snip a great explanation] Guys, can I get some Tested-by's on this? In cas

Re: [PATCH] clk: respect the clock dependencies in of_clk_init

2014-02-07 Thread Emilio López
Hi, El 07/02/14 15:10, Gregory CLEMENT escribió: (snip) --- drivers/clk/mvebu/common.c | 13 +++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/clk/mvebu/common.c b/drivers/clk/mvebu/common.c index 25ceccf..730625b 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/mvebu/common.c +++

Re: [PATCH] clk: respect the clock dependencies in of_clk_init

2014-02-07 Thread Gregory CLEMENT
On 07/02/2014 17:16, Emilio López wrote: > Hi Gregory, > > El 07/02/14 12:12, Gregory CLEMENT escribió: >> On 07/02/2014 16:00, Emilio López wrote: >>> El 07/02/14 11:49, Gregory CLEMENT escribió: On 07/02/2014 15:43, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 09:24:30AM -0500, Jaso

Re: [PATCH] clk: respect the clock dependencies in of_clk_init

2014-02-07 Thread Emilio López
Hi Gregory, El 07/02/14 12:12, Gregory CLEMENT escribió: On 07/02/2014 16:00, Emilio López wrote: El 07/02/14 11:49, Gregory CLEMENT escribió: On 07/02/2014 15:43, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 09:24:30AM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote: On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:06:08AM -0300, E

Re: [PATCH] clk: respect the clock dependencies in of_clk_init

2014-02-07 Thread Gregory CLEMENT
On 07/02/2014 16:00, Emilio López wrote: > El 07/02/14 11:49, Gregory CLEMENT escribió: >> On 07/02/2014 15:43, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 09:24:30AM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote: On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:06:08AM -0300, Emilio López wrote: [snip a great explana

Re: [PATCH] clk: respect the clock dependencies in of_clk_init

2014-02-07 Thread Emilio López
El 07/02/14 11:49, Gregory CLEMENT escribió: On 07/02/2014 15:43, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 09:24:30AM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote: On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:06:08AM -0300, Emilio López wrote: [snip a great explanation] Guys, can I get some Tested-by's on this? In case

Re: [PATCH] clk: respect the clock dependencies in of_clk_init

2014-02-07 Thread Gregory CLEMENT
On 07/02/2014 15:43, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 09:24:30AM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:06:08AM -0300, Emilio López wrote: >> >> [snip a great explanation] >> >> Guys, can I get some Tested-by's on this? >> > > In case someone missed Emilio's comme

Re: [PATCH] clk: respect the clock dependencies in of_clk_init

2014-02-07 Thread Ezequiel Garcia
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 09:24:30AM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:06:08AM -0300, Emilio López wrote: > > [snip a great explanation] > > Guys, can I get some Tested-by's on this? > In case someone missed Emilio's comment about it, I gave his oneliner a test on A370 Refer

Re: [PATCH] clk: respect the clock dependencies in of_clk_init

2014-02-07 Thread Jason Cooper
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:06:08AM -0300, Emilio López wrote: [snip a great explanation] Guys, can I get some Tested-by's on this? thx, Jason. > -8<-- > > From ffdb49506e3ce92090c15e1f9b37f4d465097ac1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: =?UTF-8?q?Emilio=20L=C3=B3pez?= > Date: Thu, 6 Feb

Re: [PATCH] clk: respect the clock dependencies in of_clk_init

2014-02-07 Thread Emilio López
Hi all, El 04/02/14 19:59, Gregory CLEMENT escribió: Until now the clock providers were initialized in the order found in the device tree. This led to have the dependencies between the clocks not respected: children clocks could be initialized before their parent clocks. Instead of forcing each

Re: [PATCH] clk: respect the clock dependencies in of_clk_init

2014-02-05 Thread Sebastian Hesselbarth
On 02/04/2014 11:59 PM, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: Until now the clock providers were initialized in the order found in the device tree. This led to have the dependencies between the clocks not respected: children clocks could be initialized before their parent clocks. Instead of forcing each platfo

Re: [PATCH] clk: respect the clock dependencies in of_clk_init

2014-02-05 Thread Boris BREZILLON
Hi Greg, On 04/02/2014 23:59, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: Until now the clock providers were initialized in the order found in the device tree. This led to have the dependencies between the clocks not respected: children clocks could be initialized before their parent clocks. Instead of forcing each

Re: [PATCH] clk: respect the clock dependencies in of_clk_init

2014-02-04 Thread Jason Cooper
Mike, On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 11:59:26PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: > Until now the clock providers were initialized in the order found in > the device tree. This led to have the dependencies between the clocks > not respected: children clocks could be initialized before their > parent clocks.

[PATCH] clk: respect the clock dependencies in of_clk_init

2014-02-04 Thread Gregory CLEMENT
Until now the clock providers were initialized in the order found in the device tree. This led to have the dependencies between the clocks not respected: children clocks could be initialized before their parent clocks. Instead of forcing each platform to manage its own initialization order, this p