On 10/06/2013 11:04 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Sebastian Hesselbarth
wrote:
Of course, we can do clk_enable, read, clk_disable as said before - and
given the amount of questions and misinterpretation, I think it is the
saner way.
Sorry for any misinterpretation
> Andrew has mentioned, that some bootloaders might disable clocks but
> leave the nodes enabled. Reading those registers would lock up
> the HW, of course. So we thought about to check clk gate status first,
> which this patch is about.
>
> Of course, we can do clk_enable, read, clk_disable as sa
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Sebastian Hesselbarth
wrote:
> On 10/06/2013 10:02 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
>>
>> Quoting Sebastian Hesselbarth (2013-10-06 12:42:01)
>>>
>>> On 10/06/2013 06:30 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 11:06:09AM +0200, Gerhard Sittig wrote:
>
On 10/06/2013 10:02 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
Quoting Sebastian Hesselbarth (2013-10-06 12:42:01)
On 10/06/2013 06:30 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 11:06:09AM +0200, Gerhard Sittig wrote:
What's wrong with an explicit enable/disable around the data
acquisition?
It avoids the
Quoting Sebastian Hesselbarth (2013-10-06 12:42:01)
> On 10/06/2013 06:30 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 11:06:09AM +0200, Gerhard Sittig wrote:
> >> On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 22:42 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 10:24:30PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wr
On 10/06/2013 06:30 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 11:06:09AM +0200, Gerhard Sittig wrote:
On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 22:42 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 10:24:30PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 12:08:30PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 11:06:09AM +0200, Gerhard Sittig wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 22:42 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 10:24:30PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 12:08:30PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> > > > To determine if a
On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 22:42 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 10:24:30PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 12:08:30PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> > > To determine if a clk has been previously enabled, provide a public
> > > clk_is_enabled fu
On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 10:24:30PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 12:08:30PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> > To determine if a clk has been previously enabled, provide a public
> > clk_is_enabled function. This is especially helpful to check the state
> > of clk-ga
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 12:08:30PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> To determine if a clk has been previously enabled, provide a public
> clk_is_enabled function. This is especially helpful to check the state
> of clk-gate without actually changing the state of the gate.
I wonder what you want
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 12:08:30PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> To determine if a clk has been previously enabled, provide a public
> clk_is_enabled function. This is especially helpful to check the state
> of clk-gate without actually changing the state of the gate.
>
> Signed-off-by: Se
To determine if a clk has been previously enabled, provide a public
clk_is_enabled function. This is especially helpful to check the state
of clk-gate without actually changing the state of the gate.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth
---
Cc: Mike Turquette
Cc: Russell King
Cc: Jason Cooper
12 matches
Mail list logo
