Re: [PATCH] clk: at91: sam9x60: fix programmable clock

2019-10-03 Thread Stephen Boyd
Quoting eugen.hris...@microchip.com (2019-09-24 03:39:09) > From: Eugen Hristev > > The prescaler mask for sam9x60 must be 0xff (8 bits). > Being set to 0, means that we cannot set any prescaler, thus the > programmable clocks do not work (except the case with prescaler 0) > Set the mask accordin

Re: [PATCH] clk: at91: sam9x60: fix programmable clock

2019-09-24 Thread Alexandre Belloni
On 24/09/2019 10:39:09+, eugen.hris...@microchip.com wrote: > From: Eugen Hristev > > The prescaler mask for sam9x60 must be 0xff (8 bits). > Being set to 0, means that we cannot set any prescaler, thus the > programmable clocks do not work (except the case with prescaler 0) > Set the mask ac

Re: [PATCH] clk: at91: sam9x60: fix programmable clock

2019-09-24 Thread Nicolas.Ferre
On 24/09/2019 at 12:39, Eugen Hristev - M18282 wrote: > From: Eugen Hristev > > The prescaler mask for sam9x60 must be 0xff (8 bits). > Being set to 0, means that we cannot set any prescaler, thus the > programmable clocks do not work (except the case with prescaler 0) > Set the mask accordingly

[PATCH] clk: at91: sam9x60: fix programmable clock

2019-09-24 Thread Eugen.Hristev
From: Eugen Hristev The prescaler mask for sam9x60 must be 0xff (8 bits). Being set to 0, means that we cannot set any prescaler, thus the programmable clocks do not work (except the case with prescaler 0) Set the mask accordingly in layout struct. Fixes: 01e2113de9a5 ("clk: at91: add sam9x60 pm