On Tue 03-01-17 00:21:45, Eryu Guan wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 04:58:03PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Sun 25-12-16 19:01:03, Chandan Rajendra wrote:
> > > The first block to be cleaned may start at a non-zero page offset. In
> > > such a scenario clean_bdev_aliases() will end up cleaning bl
On 12/25/2016 06:31 AM, Chandan Rajendra wrote:
> The first block to be cleaned may start at a non-zero page offset. In
> such a scenario clean_bdev_aliases() will end up cleaning blocks that
> do not fall in the range of blocks to be cleaned. This commit fixes the
> issue by skipping blocks that d
On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 04:58:03PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Sun 25-12-16 19:01:03, Chandan Rajendra wrote:
> > The first block to be cleaned may start at a non-zero page offset. In
> > such a scenario clean_bdev_aliases() will end up cleaning blocks that
> > do not fall in the range of blocks to
On Sun 25-12-16 19:01:03, Chandan Rajendra wrote:
> The first block to be cleaned may start at a non-zero page offset. In
> such a scenario clean_bdev_aliases() will end up cleaning blocks that
> do not fall in the range of blocks to be cleaned. This commit fixes the
> issue by skipping blocks that
The first block to be cleaned may start at a non-zero page offset. In
such a scenario clean_bdev_aliases() will end up cleaning blocks that
do not fall in the range of blocks to be cleaned. This commit fixes the
issue by skipping blocks that do not fall in valid block range.
Signed-off-by: Chandan
5 matches
Mail list logo
