On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 02:50:53PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Yep, I suspect this patch is long overdue. Jeremy, is this enough to fix
> it for you?
Yes, the 7 second timeout is fine. It actually takes about 6.7 seconds.
I guess if "another popular OS" has a 7 second timeout that we won't find
mu
On Tue, Jan 02 2007, Alan wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Jan 2007 18:36:24 -0800
> Jeremy Higdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have a DVD combo drive and a CD in which the
> > "READ TRACK INFORMATION" command (implemented in the
> > cdrom_get_track_info() function) takes about 7 seconds to run.
> > The c
On Mon, 1 Jan 2007 18:36:24 -0800
Jeremy Higdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a DVD combo drive and a CD in which the
> "READ TRACK INFORMATION" command (implemented in the
> cdrom_get_track_info() function) takes about 7 seconds to run.
> The current implementation of cdrom_get_track_info()
I have a DVD combo drive and a CD in which the
"READ TRACK INFORMATION" command (implemented in the
cdrom_get_track_info() function) takes about 7 seconds to run.
The current implementation of cdrom_get_track_info() uses the
default timeout of 5 seconds. So here's a patch that increases
the timeou
4 matches
Mail list logo