On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 02:22:57PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 6:20 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 09:31:49AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Simon Horman
> >> wrote:
> >> > Make use of ARCH_RENESAS in place
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 6:20 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 09:31:49AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Simon Horman
>> wrote:
>> > Make use of ARCH_RENESAS in place of ARCH_SHMOBILE.
>> >
>> > This is part of an ongoing process to migrate fro
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 09:31:49AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Simon Horman
> wrote:
> > Make use of ARCH_RENESAS in place of ARCH_SHMOBILE.
> >
> > This is part of an ongoing process to migrate from ARCH_SHMOBILE to
> > ARCH_RENESAS the motivation for which
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> Make use of ARCH_RENESAS in place of ARCH_SHMOBILE.
>
> This is part of an ongoing process to migrate from ARCH_SHMOBILE to
> ARCH_RENESAS the motivation for which being that RENESAS seems to be a more
> appropriate name than SHMOBILE for the m
Make use of ARCH_RENESAS in place of ARCH_SHMOBILE.
This is part of an ongoing process to migrate from ARCH_SHMOBILE to
ARCH_RENESAS the motivation for which being that RENESAS seems to be a more
appropriate name than SHMOBILE for the majority of Renesas ARM based SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horma
5 matches
Mail list logo