Hi!
Reading the subject line... I wonder if it violates Oracle's
anti-sexual-harrasment policy. As if daemons and killing children
recursively was not enough, we are now bonding inactive slaves :-).
SCNR,
Pavel
--
(english)
Zheng Li wrote:
>In bond mode tlb and alb, inactive slaves should keep inactive flag to 1 to
>refuse to receive broadcast packets. Now, active slave send broadcast packets
>(for example ARP requests) which will arrive inactive slaves on same host from
>switch, but inactive slave's inactive flag i
Hi Jay,
What's you think about the new patch.
Thanks,
Zheng Li
于 2014年03月28日 17:22, Zheng Li 写道:
> In bond mode tlb and alb, inactive slaves should keep inactive flag to 1 to
> refuse to receive broadcast packets. Now, active slave send broadcast packets
> (for example ARP requests) which will ar
In bond mode tlb and alb, inactive slaves should keep inactive flag to 1 to
refuse to receive broadcast packets. Now, active slave send broadcast packets
(for example ARP requests) which will arrive inactive slaves on same host from
switch, but inactive slave's inactive flag is zero that cause brid
于 2014年03月28日 01:23, Jay Vosburgh 写道:
> Zheng Li wrote:
>
>> In bond mode tlb and alb, inactive slaves should keep inactive flag to
>> 1 to refuse to receive broadcast packets. Now, active slave send broadcast
>> packets
>> (for example ARP requests) which will arrive inactive slaves on same hos
Zheng Li wrote:
>In bond mode tlb and alb, inactive slaves should keep inactive flag to
>1 to refuse to receive broadcast packets. Now, active slave send broadcast
>packets
>(for example ARP requests) which will arrive inactive slaves on same host from
>switch,
>but inactive slave's inactive fl
Hi Jay,
What's your opinion about the new patch.
Thanks,
Zheng Li
于 2014年03月26日 08:53, Ding Tianhong 写道:
> On 2014/3/25 16:36, zheng.li wrote:
>> 于 2014年03月25日 11:42, Ding Tianhong 写道:
>>> On 2014/3/25 11:00, Zheng Li wrote:
In bond mode tlb and alb, inactive slaves should keep inactive flag
On 2014/3/25 16:36, zheng.li wrote:
> 于 2014年03月25日 11:42, Ding Tianhong 写道:
>> On 2014/3/25 11:00, Zheng Li wrote:
>>> In bond mode tlb and alb, inactive slaves should keep inactive flag to
>>> 1 to refuse to receive broadcast packets. Now, active slave send broadcast
>>> packets
>>> (for example
于 2014年03月25日 11:42, Ding Tianhong 写道:
> On 2014/3/25 11:00, Zheng Li wrote:
>> In bond mode tlb and alb, inactive slaves should keep inactive flag to
>> 1 to refuse to receive broadcast packets. Now, active slave send broadcast
>> packets
>> (for example ARP requests) which will arrive inactive s
On 2014/3/25 11:00, Zheng Li wrote:
> In bond mode tlb and alb, inactive slaves should keep inactive flag to
> 1 to refuse to receive broadcast packets. Now, active slave send broadcast
> packets
> (for example ARP requests) which will arrive inactive slaves on same host
> from switch,
> but inac
In bond mode tlb and alb, inactive slaves should keep inactive flag to
1 to refuse to receive broadcast packets. Now, active slave send broadcast
packets
(for example ARP requests) which will arrive inactive slaves on same host from
switch,
but inactive slave's inactive flag is zero that cause br
From: "zheng.li"
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 17:01:42 +0800
> Recreate patch again as below, please check.
Your patch has been severely corrupted by your email client, and is
thus unusable by anyone.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message t
Recreate patch again as below, please check.
>From 9f504b1ee94e87dcfbb330ebd2f5bc6ca91f4b5b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zheng Li
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:53:25 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] bonding: Inactive slaves should keep inactive flag's
value to 1 in
tlb and alb mode.
In bond mode
zheng.li wrote:
>于 2014年03月21日 01:02, Jay Vosburgh 写道:
>> Zheng Li wrote:
>>
>>> Except bond mode 1, in other bond modes, inactive slaves should keep
>>> inactive flag to 1 to refuse to receive broadcast packets. Now, active
>>> slave send broadcast packets (for example ARP requests) which will
Hello.
On 03/20/2014 11:51 AM, Zheng Li wrote:
Except bond mode 1, in other bond modes, inactive slaves should keep inactive
flag to
1 to refuse to receive broadcast packets. Now, active slave send broadcast
packets
(for example ARP requests) which will arrive inactive slaves on same host fro
On 2014/3/21 10:39, zheng.li wrote:
> 于 2014年03月21日 01:02, Jay Vosburgh 写道:
>> Zheng Li wrote:
>>
>>> Except bond mode 1, in other bond modes, inactive slaves should keep
>>> inactive flag to 1 to refuse to receive broadcast packets. Now, active
>>> slave send broadcast packets (for example ARP re
于 2014年03月21日 01:02, Jay Vosburgh 写道:
> Zheng Li wrote:
>
>> Except bond mode 1, in other bond modes, inactive slaves should keep
>> inactive flag to 1 to refuse to receive broadcast packets. Now, active
>> slave send broadcast packets (for example ARP requests) which will
>> arrive inactive slav
Zheng Li wrote:
>Except bond mode 1, in other bond modes, inactive slaves should keep
>inactive flag to 1 to refuse to receive broadcast packets. Now, active
>slave send broadcast packets (for example ARP requests) which will
>arrive inactive slaves on same host from switch, but inactive slave's
On 2014/3/20 16:51, Zheng Li wrote:
> Except bond mode 1, in other bond modes, inactive slaves should keep inactive
> flag to
> 1 to refuse to receive broadcast packets. Now, active slave send broadcast
> packets
> (for example ARP requests) which will arrive inactive slaves on same host
> from
Except bond mode 1, in other bond modes, inactive slaves should keep inactive
flag to
1 to refuse to receive broadcast packets. Now, active slave send broadcast
packets
(for example ARP requests) which will arrive inactive slaves on same host from
switch,
but inactive slave's inactive flag is ze
20 matches
Mail list logo
