On Tue, 24 May 2016, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > Ok, I call it officially ridiculous now. I guess I'll be resending through
> > akpm.
>
> You can just send it to me, I've funneled bcache stable fixes before.
>
> > Is it a time to claim (by MAINTAINERS entry) the in-tree bcache orphaned?
>
> I think s
On 05/23/2016 05:05 PM, Jiri Kosina wrote:
On Wed, 18 May 2016, Jiri Kosina wrote:
bch_writeback_thread() is calling try_to_freeze(), but that's just an
expensive no-op given the fact that the thread is not marked freezable.
I/O helper kthreads, exactly such as the bcache writeback thread, act
On Wed, 18 May 2016, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > > bch_writeback_thread() is calling try_to_freeze(), but that's just an
> > > expensive no-op given the fact that the thread is not marked freezable.
> > >
> > > I/O helper kthreads, exactly such as the bcache writeback thread,
> > > actually
> > > s
On Mon, 2 May 2016, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > From: Jiri Kosina
> >
> > bch_writeback_thread() is calling try_to_freeze(), but that's just an
> > expensive no-op given the fact that the thread is not marked freezable.
> >
> > I/O helper kthreads, exactly such as the bcache writeback thread, actua
On Tue, 10 May 2016, Eric Wheeler wrote:
> > > bch_writeback_thread() is calling try_to_freeze(), but that's just an
> > > expensive no-op given the fact that the thread is not marked freezable.
> > >
> > > I/O helper kthreads, exactly such as the bcache writeback thread,
> > > actually
> > >
On Mon, 2 May 2016, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>
> > From: Jiri Kosina
> >
> > bch_writeback_thread() is calling try_to_freeze(), but that's just an
> > expensive no-op given the fact that the thread is not marked freezable.
> >
> > I/O helper kthreads, exactl
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> From: Jiri Kosina
>
> bch_writeback_thread() is calling try_to_freeze(), but that's just an
> expensive no-op given the fact that the thread is not marked freezable.
>
> I/O helper kthreads, exactly such as the bcache writeback thread, actually
> shou
On Fri, 22 Apr 2016, Eric Wheeler wrote:
> > I'll try to capture the output today.
>
> No technical data yet, but this is the thread:
>
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.bcache.devel/3820
Thanks. It's highly unlikely that this will be fixed by these three
patches though (the cod
On Wed, 20 Apr 2016, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, Eric Wheeler wrote:
>
> > > bch_writeback_thread() is calling try_to_freeze(), but that's just an
> > > expensive no-op given the fact that the thread is not marked freezable.
> > >
> > > I/O helper kthreads, exactly such as the bcac
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, Eric Wheeler wrote:
> > bch_writeback_thread() is calling try_to_freeze(), but that's just an
> > expensive no-op given the fact that the thread is not marked freezable.
> >
> > I/O helper kthreads, exactly such as the bcache writeback thread, actually
> > shouldn't be free
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> From: Jiri Kosina
>
> bch_writeback_thread() is calling try_to_freeze(), but that's just an
> expensive no-op given the fact that the thread is not marked freezable.
>
> I/O helper kthreads, exactly such as the bcache writeback thread, actually
> sho
From: Jiri Kosina
bch_writeback_thread() is calling try_to_freeze(), but that's just an
expensive no-op given the fact that the thread is not marked freezable.
I/O helper kthreads, exactly such as the bcache writeback thread, actually
shouldn't be freezable, because they are potentially necess
12 matches
Mail list logo
