Re: [PATCH] balance inactive_dirty list

2001-06-04 Thread Mark Hahn
> while observing lots of different workloads (all I/O bound). Finally, well, not all loads are IO-bound in the sense you're looking at. in particular, the test I usually run (make -j2 with mem=48m) is actually hurt by this patch. but you're right, this change does improve streaming IO. > We'r

[PATCH] balance inactive_dirty list

2001-06-02 Thread Zlatko Calusic
For a long time I've been thinking that inactive list is too small, while observing lots of different workloads (all I/O bound). Finally, I decided to take a look and try to improve things. In mm/vmscan.c I found this overly complicated piece of heuristics: if (!target) { int inactive = n