On Fri, 2013-12-27 at 11:53 +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Ian Kent wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> saw some typos...
Right, I'm pretty tired, and seem to be so a lot these days.
Andrew, let me fix the typos and re-submit the patch.
>
> > From: Ian Kent
> >
> > The autofs4
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Ian Kent wrote:
Hi,
saw some typos...
> From: Ian Kent
>
> The autofs4 module doesn't consider symlinks for expire as it did
> in the older autofs v3 module (so it's actually a long stnding
s/stnding/standing
> regression).
>
> The user space daemon has focus
From: Ian Kent
The autofs4 module doesn't consider symlinks for expire as it did
in the older autofs v3 module (so it's actually a long stnding
regression).
The user space daemon has focused on the use of bind mounts instead
of symlinks for a long time now and that's why this has not been
notice
From: Ian Kent
The autofs4 module doesn't consider symlinks for expire.
The user space daemon has focused on the use of bind mounts
instead of symlinks for a long time now. But, with the
future addition of amd map parsing in automount(8), not
to mention amd iteslf, symlink expiry is needed.
The
4 matches
Mail list logo