On 14/09/05, 胡剑阳 wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
Hello gentlemen,
> I don't know if we can keep audit_inode() in do_last(). I've tried
> this but found
> the only way to enable both write() and create() is moving it to
> lookup_open().
> I know this is not good, but I think we have no choice.
>
> The current
Hi Jeff,
I don't know if we can keep audit_inode() in do_last(). I've tried
this but found
the only way to enable both write() and create() is moving it to lookup_open().
I know this is not good, but I think we have no choice.
The current patch really miss the ROFS condition as you said. How abou
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014 14:55:53 +0800
hujianyang wrote:
> commit 33e2208acfc1
>
> audit: vfs: fix audit_inode call in O_CREAT case of do_last
>
> fix a regression in auditing of open(..., O_CREAT) syscalls but
> import a new problem which lead the records of write operation
> confusion.
>
> This e
commit 33e2208acfc1
audit: vfs: fix audit_inode call in O_CREAT case of do_last
fix a regression in auditing of open(..., O_CREAT) syscalls but
import a new problem which lead the records of write operation
confusion.
This error can be reproduced by these steps:
touch /etc/test
4 matches
Mail list logo