Re: [PATCH] audit: handle loginuid through proc

2005-02-25 Thread Chris Wright
* Albert Cahalan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 22:49 -0800, Chris Wright wrote: > > * Albert Cahalan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > Assuming you'd like ps to print the LUID, how about > > > putting it with all the others? There are "Uid:" > > > lines in the /proc/*/status

Re: [PATCH] audit: handle loginuid through proc

2005-02-25 Thread Albert Cahalan
On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 22:49 -0800, Chris Wright wrote: > * Albert Cahalan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Assuming you'd like ps to print the LUID, how about > > putting it with all the others? There are "Uid:" > > lines in the /proc/*/status files. > > It's also set (written) via /proc, so it sho

Re: [PATCH] audit: handle loginuid through proc

2005-02-24 Thread Chris Wright
* Albert Cahalan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Assuming you'd like ps to print the LUID, how about > putting it with all the others? There are "Uid:" > lines in the /proc/*/status files. It's also set (written) via /proc, so it should probably stay separate. thanks, -chris -- Linux Security Modul

Re: [PATCH] audit: handle loginuid through proc

2005-02-24 Thread Albert Cahalan
Assuming you'd like ps to print the LUID, how about putting it with all the others? There are "Uid:" lines in the /proc/*/status files. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kerne

[PATCH] [audit] handle loginuid through proc

2005-01-27 Thread Serge E. Hallyn
The audit subsystem uses netlink messages to request loginuid changes. Due to the sensitivity of loginuid, netlink appears to be insufficient. For instance, it is not easy to guarantee that the loginuid message will be handled before any other auditable actions, and there is even the remote possi