Re: [PATCH] atm: fore200e.c: Cleaning up uninitialized variables

2014-06-02 Thread David Miller
From: Olof Johansson Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2014 17:10:39 -0700 > On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Rickard Strandqvist > wrote: >> There is a risk that the variable will be used without being initialized. >> >> This was largely found by using a static code analysis program called >> cppcheck. >> >> S

Re: [PATCH] atm: fore200e.c: Cleaning up uninitialized variables

2014-06-02 Thread Rickard Strandqvist
Hi No, regardless if it is a program that cppcheck or myself with limited experience of kernel programming is not so easy to figure out. But then I know that there is nothing wrong in this case, and that is the main thing :-) Best regards Rickard Strandqvist 2014-06-02 2:10 GMT+02:00 Olof Joha

Re: [PATCH] atm: fore200e.c: Cleaning up uninitialized variables

2014-06-01 Thread Olof Johansson
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Rickard Strandqvist wrote: > There is a risk that the variable will be used without being initialized. > > This was largely found by using a static code analysis program called > cppcheck. > > Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist > --- > drivers/atm/fore200e.c |

[PATCH] atm: fore200e.c: Cleaning up uninitialized variables

2014-05-31 Thread Rickard Strandqvist
There is a risk that the variable will be used without being initialized. This was largely found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck. Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist --- drivers/atm/fore200e.c |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/