hi,
> > About SDRAm self refresh mode on at91sam926x, in fact AT91_SDRAMC_SRR
> > doesn't exist but the new register is AT91_SDRAMC_LPR. So for instance, you
> > can replace at91_sys_write(AT91_SDRAMC_SRR, 1) by
> > at91_sys_write(AT91_SDRAMC_LPR, AT91_SDRAMC_LPCB_SELF_REFRESH).
>
> I have also m
Andy Herzig"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 9:33 AM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] at91 pm: Compilation fix for at91sam926x
On Friday 10 August 2007 09:12, Hans-Jürgen Koch wrote:
> Am Freitag 10 August 2007 00:15 schrieb Ulf Samuelsson:
> >
> > > >
Hi Pierre,
I'm also using power management on the at91sam9260.
> About SDRAm self refresh mode on at91sam926x, in fact AT91_SDRAMC_SRR
> doesn't exist but the new register is AT91_SDRAMC_LPR. So for instance, you
> can replace at91_sys_write(AT91_SDRAMC_SRR, 1) by
> at91_sys_write(AT91_SDRAMC_LPR
On Friday 10 August 2007 09:12, Hans-Jürgen Koch wrote:
> Am Freitag 10 August 2007 00:15 schrieb Ulf Samuelsson:
> >
> > > > +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_AT91RM9200)
> > > > at91_sys_write(AT91_SDRAMC_SRR, 1); /*
> > > > self-refresh mode */
> >
> > > Why don't use:
> > >
Am Freitag 10 August 2007 00:15 schrieb Ulf Samuelsson:
>
> > > +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_AT91RM9200)
> > > at91_sys_write(AT91_SDRAMC_SRR, 1); /*
> > > self-refresh mode */
>
> > Why don't use:
> > if (cpu_is_at91rm9200())
> > at91_sys_write(AT91_SDRAMC_SRR, 1);
>
> W
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_AT91RM9200)
> > at91_sys_write(AT91_SDRAMC_SRR, 1); /*
> > self-refresh mode */
> Why don't use:
> if (cpu_is_at91rm9200())
> at91_sys_write(AT91_SDRAMC_SRR, 1);
What is the benefit?
Will the optimizer remove the code if the CPU is not the
Am Donnerstag 09 August 2007 19:17 schrieb Andy Herzig:
> On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 18:01 +0200, Marc Pignat wrote:
>
> > > > +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_AT91RM9200)
> > > > at91_sys_write(AT91_SDRAMC_SRR, 1); /*
> > > > self-refresh mode */
> > Why don't use:
> > if (cpu_is_a
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 18:01 +0200, Marc Pignat wrote:
> > > +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_AT91RM9200)
> > > at91_sys_write(AT91_SDRAMC_SRR, 1); /*
> > > self-refresh mode */
> Why don't use:
> if (cpu_is_at91rm9200())
> at91_sys_write(AT91_SDRAMC_SRR, 1);
>
No reason.
Hello!
On Thursday 09 August 2007 16:53, Hans-Jürgen Koch wrote:
> (added linux-arm-kernel to CC)
>
> Am Donnerstag 09 August 2007 14:10 schrieb Andy Herzig:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > This patch is intended to fix compilation errors when I tried to add in
> > power management to my Atmel AT91SAM926
(added linux-arm-kernel to CC)
Am Donnerstag 09 August 2007 14:10 schrieb Andy Herzig:
> Hello all,
>
> This patch is intended to fix compilation errors when I tried to add in
> power management to my Atmel AT91SAM9260 board. First, there is no
> separate memory controller in the 9260 as there is
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 08:10 -0400, Andy Herzig wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> This patch is intended to fix compilation errors when I tried to add in
> power management to my Atmel AT91SAM9260 board. First, there is no
> separate memory controller in the 9260 as there is in the 9200, so calls
> to do any
Hello all,
This patch is intended to fix compilation errors when I tried to add in
power management to my Atmel AT91SAM9260 board. First, there is no
separate memory controller in the 9260 as there is in the 9200, so calls
to do anything with it in pm.c fail.
Secondly, at91_suspend_entering_slow_
12 matches
Mail list logo
