On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 06:42:09PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> Back in 2011, Russell pointed out that the "async_tx channel switch"
> capability was violating expectations of the dma mapping api [1]. At the
> time the existing uses were reviewed as still usable, but that longer
> term we needed a
Back in 2011, Russell pointed out that the "async_tx channel switch"
capability was violating expectations of the dma mapping api [1]. At the
time the existing uses were reviewed as still usable, but that longer
term we needed a rework of the raid offload implementation. While some
of the framework
2 matches
Mail list logo
