Jason,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 05:29:36PM -0500, Jason Wessel wrote:
> On 09/15/2016 11:32 PM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> >@@ -176,18 +183,14 @@ int kgdb_arch_handle_exception(int exception_vector,
> >int signo,
> >>>* over and over again.
> >>>*/
> >>> kgdb_arch_u
On 09/15/2016 11:32 PM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
@@ -176,18 +183,14 @@ int kgdb_arch_handle_exception(int exception_vector, int
signo,
* over and over again.
*/
kgdb_arch_update_addr(linux_regs, remcom_in_buffer);
- atomic_set(&kgdb_
On 09/16/2016 02:45 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 01:32:19PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 08:04:57AM -0500, Jason Wessel wrote:
I added the patch to kgdb-next after fixing up the context since it no
longer applied to the mainline (
https://git.kernel.or
A Jason appeared!
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 01:32:19PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 08:04:57AM -0500, Jason Wessel wrote:
> > I added the patch to kgdb-next after fixing up the context since it no
> > longer applied to the mainline (
> > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/k
Hi Jason,
Welcome back to mainline development.
I've been looking forward to your comments.
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 08:04:57AM -0500, Jason Wessel wrote:
> On 04/20/2015 08:13 PM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> >Jason,
> >
> >Could you please review my patch below?
> >See also arm64 maintainer's commen
On 04/20/2015 08:13 PM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
Jason,
Could you please review my patch below?
See also arm64 maintainer's comment:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-January/313712.html
Thanks,
-Takahiro AKASHI
I tried to verify kgdb in vanilla kernel on fast model, but
On 09/15/2016 05:41 AM, Daniel Thompson wrote:
On 15/09/16 08:56, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 03:58:51PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
Hi Akashi,
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 02:13:13AM +0100, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
Could you please review my patch below?
See also arm64 maintainer's
On 15/09/16 08:56, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 03:58:51PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
Hi Akashi,
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 02:13:13AM +0100, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
Could you please review my patch below?
See also arm64 maintainer's comment:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/l
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 03:58:51PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Akashi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 02:13:13AM +0100, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > Could you please review my patch below?
> > See also arm64 maintainer's comment:
> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-January
Hi Akashi,
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 02:13:13AM +0100, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> Could you please review my patch below?
> See also arm64 maintainer's comment:
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-January/313712.html
-ETIMEDOUT waiting for the kdgb folk to comment. Ppeople ha
Jason,
Could you please review my patch below?
See also arm64 maintainer's comment:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-January/313712.html
Thanks,
-Takahiro AKASHI
I tried to verify kgdb in vanilla kernel on fast model, but it seems that
the single stepping with kgdb does
Kumar, Vijaya; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org;
linaro-ker...@lists.linaro.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: kgdb: fix single stepping
Hi Will,
I have used Takahiro's patch to fix the single stepping problem of KGDB
on arm64. We had real hardware called A
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 11:52:42PM +, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> Hi Will,
Hi Akashi,
> What's the current status of this patch?
> I'm pretty sure that the bug is reproducable and can be fixed
> with my patch since I've got a report from another guy
> who had the same problem and tried my patch.
Hi Will,
I have used Takahiro's patch to fix the single stepping problem of KGDB
on arm64. We had real hardware called AMD Seattle. The problem I had is
exactly the same as the description of Takahiro. We are working on
kernel 3.14, but we did port back many patches related to arm64 from
high
...@arm.com
Cc: dsax...@linaro.org; Kumar, Vijaya; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org;
linaro-ker...@lists.linaro.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: kgdb: fix single stepping
Hi Will,
I have used Takahiro's patch to fix the single stepping problem of KGDB
on arm64. W
Hi Will,
What's the current status of this patch?
I'm pretty sure that the bug is reproducable and can be fixed
with my patch since I've got a report from another guy
who had the same problem and tried my patch.
Thanks,
-Takahiro AKASHI
On 10/21/2014 02:07 PM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
I tried to
Vijay,
On 11/07/2014 10:10 PM, Vijay Kilari wrote:
Hi Akashil,
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 5:48 AM, AKASHI Takahiro
wrote:
Vijay,
On 10/27/2014 09:45 PM, Vijay Kilari wrote:
Hi Akashi,
I could not reproduce this with my simulator.
It would be good if you could post result of KGDB test
Hi Akashil,
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 5:48 AM, AKASHI Takahiro
wrote:
> Vijay,
>
> On 10/27/2014 09:45 PM, Vijay Kilari wrote:
>>
>> Hi Akashi,
>>
>> I could not reproduce this with my simulator.
>> It would be good if you could post result of KGDB test suite.
>>
>> From sysfs you can launc
Vijay,
On 10/27/2014 09:45 PM, Vijay Kilari wrote:
Hi Akashi,
I could not reproduce this with my simulator.
It would be good if you could post result of KGDB test suite.
From sysfs you can launch using below command:
echo V1F1000 > /sys/module/kgdbts/parameters/kgdbts
or enable boot tes
Hi Akashi,
I could not reproduce this with my simulator.
It would be good if you could post result of KGDB test suite.
>From sysfs you can launch using below command:
echo V1F1000 > /sys/module/kgdbts/parameters/kgdbts
or enable boot test.
Other than that it is OK.
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 06:07:30AM +0100, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> I tried to verify kgdb in vanilla kernel on fast model, but it seems that
> the single stepping with kgdb doesn't work correctly since its first
> appearance at v3.15.
>
> On v3.15, 'stepi' command after breaking the kernel at some
I tried to verify kgdb in vanilla kernel on fast model, but it seems that
the single stepping with kgdb doesn't work correctly since its first
appearance at v3.15.
On v3.15, 'stepi' command after breaking the kernel at some breakpoint
steps forward to the next instruction, but the succeeding 'step
22 matches
Mail list logo
