[+Jonathan]
On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 08:27:09PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
[...]
> I did some investigation for this issue. I am sorry I made some
> misleading description in the commit message. The issue is, when we
> want to disable the NUMA from firmware, we usually just remove the SRAT
> table
Hi Lorenzo,
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 11:41:29PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
Hi,
锟斤拷 2020/9/28 23:23, Lorenzo Pieralisi 写锟斤拷:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 10:49:57PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 03:00:55PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
[+ Lorenzo]
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 06:33:24
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 11:41:29PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
Hi,
锟斤拷 2020/9/28 23:23, Lorenzo Pieralisi 写锟斤拷:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 10:49:57PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 03:00:55PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
[+ Lorenzo]
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 06:33:24PM +0800, Bao
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 11:41:29PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 锟斤拷 2020/9/28 23:23, Lorenzo Pieralisi 写锟斤拷:
> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 10:49:57PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 03:00:55PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > > [+ Lorenzo]
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Sep 2
Hi,
在 2020/9/28 23:23, Lorenzo Pieralisi 写道:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 10:49:57PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 03:00:55PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
[+ Lorenzo]
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 06:33:24PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
If the BIOS disabled the NUMA configuration, but did
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 10:49:57PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 03:00:55PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > [+ Lorenzo]
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 06:33:24PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> > > If the BIOS disabled the NUMA configuration, but did not change the
> > > proximity
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 03:00:55PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> [+ Lorenzo]
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 06:33:24PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> > If the BIOS disabled the NUMA configuration, but did not change the
> > proximity domain description in the SRAT table, so the PCI root bus
> > device may
[+ Lorenzo]
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 06:33:24PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> If the BIOS disabled the NUMA configuration, but did not change the
> proximity domain description in the SRAT table, so the PCI root bus
> device may get a incorrect node id by acpi_get_node().
How "incorrect" are we talk
If the BIOS disabled the NUMA configuration, but did not change the
proximity domain description in the SRAT table, so the PCI root bus
device may get a incorrect node id by acpi_get_node().
Thus better to add a numa node validation before setting numa node
for the PCI root bus, like pci_acpi_root
9 matches
Mail list logo