On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 3:46 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2 Jan 2016, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 02:54:10PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > I have no real opinion about that patch. It does no harm to
> > > unconditionally
> > > setup the hrtimer based
Hi, Russell,
> On Sat, 2 Jan 2016, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 02:54:10PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > I have no real opinion about that patch. It does no harm to
> > > unconditionally setup the hrtimer based broadcast even if it's never
> used.
> > >
> > > U
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 02:54:10PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > I have no real opinion about that patch. It does no harm to unconditionally
> > setup the hrtimer based broadcast even if it's never used.
> >
> > Up to the arch maintainer to
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 02:54:10PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Dec 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > On Monday 28 December 2015 07:18:58 Huan Wang wrote:
> > > Hi, Arnd,
> > >
> > > Could you help to review the following patch? Thanks.
> > >
> >
> > Hi Alison,
> >
> > I'm sorry
On Mon, 28 Dec 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 28 December 2015 07:18:58 Huan Wang wrote:
> > Hi, Arnd,
> >
> > Could you help to review the following patch? Thanks.
> >
>
> Hi Alison,
>
> I'm sorry but I understand very little of this particular area of the kernel.
>
> I've added
On Monday 28 December 2015 07:18:58 Huan Wang wrote:
> Hi, Arnd,
>
> Could you help to review the following patch? Thanks.
>
Hi Alison,
I'm sorry but I understand very little of this particular area of the kernel.
I've added Daniel Lezcano, John Stultz and Thomas Gleixner to Cc, they all
Hi, Arnd,
Could you help to review the following patch? Thanks.
Best Regards,
Alison Wang
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:11:52AM +0100, Alison Wang wrote:
> > Hrtimer based broadcast is used on ARM platform. It can be registered
> > as the tick broadcast device in the absence of a real ex
Hi,
Could you help to review this patch?
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Alison Wang
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:11:52AM +0100, Alison Wang wrote:
> > Hrtimer based broadcast is used on ARM platform. It can be registered
> > as the tick broadcast device in the absence of a real external
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:11:52AM +0100, Alison Wang wrote:
> Hrtimer based broadcast is used on ARM platform. It can be
> registered as the tick broadcast device in the absence of
> a real external clock device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alison Wang
This looks sensible to me. FWIW:
Acked-by: Mark Ru
2 PM
> To: mark.rutl...@arm.com; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Wang Huan-B18965
> Subject: [PATCH] arm: kernel: utilize hrtimer based broadcast
>
> Hrtimer based broadcast is used on ARM platform. It can be registered as
> the tick b
Hrtimer based broadcast is used on ARM platform. It can be
registered as the tick broadcast device in the absence of
a real external clock device.
Signed-off-by: Alison Wang
---
arch/arm/kernel/time.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/time.c b/arch/arm/kernel
11 matches
Mail list logo
