From: Behan Webster
With compilers which follow the C99 standard (like modern versions of gcc and
clang), "extern inline" does the wrong thing (emits code for an externally
linkable version of the inline function). In this case using static inline
and removing the NULL version of return_address i
On Tue, 11 Mar 2014 00:01:44 -0700
Behan Webster wrote:
> On 02/20/14 18:22, beh...@converseincode.com wrote:
> > From: Behan Webster
> >
> > With compilers which follow the C99 standard (like modern versions of gcc
> > and
> > clang), "extern inline" does the wrong thing (emits code for an ext
On 02/20/14 18:22, beh...@converseincode.com wrote:
From: Behan Webster
With compilers which follow the C99 standard (like modern versions of gcc and
clang), "extern inline" does the wrong thing (emits code for an externally
linkable version of the inline function). In this case using static in
From: Behan Webster
With compilers which follow the C99 standard (like modern versions of gcc and
clang), "extern inline" does the wrong thing (emits code for an externally
linkable version of the inline function). In this case using static inline
and removing the NULL version of return_address i
4 matches
Mail list logo