On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 12:29:33PM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 11:32:50AM +, Dave P Martin wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 11:00:19AM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 08:57:51AM +, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 08:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 11:32:50AM +, Dave P Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 11:00:19AM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 08:57:51AM +, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 08:39:01AM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 03:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 11:00:19AM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 08:57:51AM +, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 08:39:01AM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 03:19:35PM +0800, Zhaoyang Huang wrote:
> > > > From: Zhaoyang Huang
> >
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 11:00:19AM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 08:57:51AM +, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 08:39:01AM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 03:19:35PM +0800, Zhaoyang Huang wrote:
> > > > From: Zhaoyang Huang
> >
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 08:57:51AM +, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 08:39:01AM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 03:19:35PM +0800, Zhaoyang Huang wrote:
> > > From: Zhaoyang Huang
> > >
> > > In some cases, the instruction of "bl foo1" will be the last
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 08:39:01AM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 03:19:35PM +0800, Zhaoyang Huang wrote:
> > From: Zhaoyang Huang
> >
> > In some cases, the instruction of "bl foo1" will be the last one of the
> > foo2[1], which will cause the lr be the first instruction of
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 03:19:35PM +0800, Zhaoyang Huang wrote:
> From: Zhaoyang Huang
>
> In some cases, the instruction of "bl foo1" will be the last one of the
> foo2[1], which will cause the lr be the first instruction of the adjacent
> foo3[2]. Hence, the backtrace will show the weird result
From: Zhaoyang Huang
In some cases, the instruction of "bl foo1" will be the last one of the
foo2[1], which will cause the lr be the first instruction of the adjacent
foo3[2]. Hence, the backtrace will show the weird result as bellow[3].
The patch will fix it by miner 4 of the lr when dump_backtr
8 matches
Mail list logo