On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 01:36:19AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I just did a successful gcc-4.1.0 alpha allmodconfig build with 2.6.23-rc5
> plus 44 patches which are in or are targetted for 2.6.23:
Yeah, things seem to be in better shape now.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsu
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 10:14:37 +0200 Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 01:11:50AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sat, 8 Sep 2007 21:12:57 +0200 Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > This patch converts alpha to the generic sys_ptrace.
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 01:11:50AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Sep 2007 21:12:57 +0200 Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This patch converts alpha to the generic sys_ptrace. We use
> > force_successful_syscall_return to avoid having to pass the pt_regs
> > pointer dow
On Sat, 8 Sep 2007 21:12:57 +0200 Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch converts alpha to the generic sys_ptrace. We use
> force_successful_syscall_return to avoid having to pass the pt_regs
> pointer down to the function. I think the removal of the assemly
> stub is correct,
This patch converts alpha to the generic sys_ptrace. We use
force_successful_syscall_return to avoid having to pass the pt_regs
pointer down to the function. I think the removal of the assemly
stub is correct, but I could only compile-test this patch, so please
give it a spin before commiting :)
5 matches
Mail list logo