On Thu, 17 May 2007 00:09:22 +0300 Dan Aloni wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 07:33:21PM +, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Wed 2007-05-16 19:51:07, Dan Aloni wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 08:23:11AM +, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > On Sun 2007-05-13 19:20:35, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 07:33:21PM +, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Wed 2007-05-16 19:51:07, Dan Aloni wrote:
> > On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 08:23:11AM +, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > On Sun 2007-05-13 19:20:35, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 09:23:52AM -0700, Stephen Hemming
On Wed 2007-05-16 19:51:07, Dan Aloni wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 08:23:11AM +, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Sun 2007-05-13 19:20:35, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 09:23:52AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 13 May 2007 16:25:17 +0300
> > > > Dan Aloni
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 08:23:11AM +, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Sun 2007-05-13 19:20:35, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 09:23:52AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > On Sun, 13 May 2007 16:25:17 +0300
> > > Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Kernel devel
On Sun 2007-05-13 19:20:35, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 09:23:52AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 May 2007 16:25:17 +0300
> > Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Kernel developers might find it useful for quickly getting out from some
> > > rough
Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> doesn't really help if hotplug loads a broken module before you're getting
> a login prompt. So while this is a bit of a hack I'm all in favour of this.
> (Especially as I got hit by this issue again yesterday)
At least on SUSE the hotplug code i
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 04:23:21PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, 13 May 2007 16:25:17 +0300, Dan Aloni said:
> > Kernel developers might find it useful for quickly getting out from some
> > rough debugging scenarios.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I think I
On Sun, 13 May 2007 16:25:17 +0300, Dan Aloni said:
> Kernel developers might find it useful for quickly getting out from some
> rough debugging scenarios.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I think I (and everybody else who tests kernels with 3rd-party binary or
out-of-tree module
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 09:23:52AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
[]
>> There is already the modprobe blacklist ability in user space.
>
> doesn't really help if hotplug loads a broken module before you're getting
> a login prompt.
modprobe blacklist is designed especi
Dan Aloni wrote:
[]
> Yes, I guess a shell script can always look at /proc/cmdline with
> relatively minimal complexity.
>
> Anyway, it all boils down to whether there's a developer demand
> for a userspace-independent way of blacklisting modules. Let's see
> if more people post their opinion so
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 10:04:20PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> There are two issues (IMHO anyway), both are userspace.
>
> First is the ability blacklist the given module from bootloader.
> My initramfs has it since the beginning - it allows a noload=xxx
> paramerer (comma-separated list of mo
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 09:23:52AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Sun, 13 May 2007 16:25:17 +0300
> Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Kernel developers might find it useful for quickly getting out from some
> > rough debugging scenarios.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PR
Dan Aloni wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 09:23:52AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> On Sun, 13 May 2007 16:25:17 +0300
>> Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Kernel developers might find it useful for quickly getting out from some
>>> rough debugging scenarios.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by:
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 09:23:52AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Sun, 13 May 2007 16:25:17 +0300
> Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Kernel developers might find it useful for quickly getting out from some
> > rough debugging scenarios.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PR
> On Sun, 13 May 2007 16:25:17 +0300
> Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Kernel developers might find it useful for quickly getting out from some
>> rough debugging scenarios.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>
> There is already the modprobe blacklist ability in
On Sun, 13 May 2007 16:25:17 +0300
Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kernel developers might find it useful for quickly getting out from some
> rough debugging scenarios.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
There is already the modprobe blacklist ability in user space.
-
To
Kernel developers might find it useful for quickly getting out from some
rough debugging scenarios.
Signed-off-by: Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
index 4e009fd..796715e 100644
--- a/init/Kconfig
+++ b/init/Kconfig
@@ -682,6 +682,17 @@ config KMOD
17 matches
Mail list logo
