Re: [PATCH] UBI: fastmap: fix backward compatibility with image_seq

2013-09-27 Thread Richard Genoud
2013/9/27 Richard Weinberger : > Am 27.09.2013 15:16, schrieb Richard Genoud: >> 2013/9/27 Richard Weinberger : >>> Am 27.09.2013 14:51, schrieb Richard Genoud: Some old UBI implementations (e.g. U-Boot) have not implemented the image sequence feature. So, when erase blocks are writt

Re: [PATCH] UBI: fastmap: fix backward compatibility with image_seq

2013-09-27 Thread Richard Weinberger
Am 27.09.2013 15:16, schrieb Richard Genoud: > 2013/9/27 Richard Weinberger : >> Am 27.09.2013 14:51, schrieb Richard Genoud: >>> Some old UBI implementations (e.g. U-Boot) have not implemented the image >>> sequence feature. >>> So, when erase blocks are written, the image sequence in the ec heade

Re: [PATCH] UBI: fastmap: fix backward compatibility with image_seq

2013-09-27 Thread Richard Genoud
2013/9/27 Richard Weinberger : > Am 27.09.2013 14:51, schrieb Richard Genoud: >> Some old UBI implementations (e.g. U-Boot) have not implemented the image >> sequence feature. >> So, when erase blocks are written, the image sequence in the ec header >> is lost (set to zero). >> UBI scan_all() takes

Re: [PATCH] UBI: fastmap: fix backward compatibility with image_seq

2013-09-27 Thread Richard Weinberger
Am 27.09.2013 14:51, schrieb Richard Genoud: > Some old UBI implementations (e.g. U-Boot) have not implemented the image > sequence feature. > So, when erase blocks are written, the image sequence in the ec header > is lost (set to zero). > UBI scan_all() takes this case into account (commits > 32b

[PATCH] UBI: fastmap: fix backward compatibility with image_seq

2013-09-27 Thread Richard Genoud
Some old UBI implementations (e.g. U-Boot) have not implemented the image sequence feature. So, when erase blocks are written, the image sequence in the ec header is lost (set to zero). UBI scan_all() takes this case into account (commits 32bc4820287a1a03982979515949e8ea56eac641 and 2eadaad67b2b6bd