Re: [PATCH] Staging: tidspbridge: Use hashtable implementation

2014-01-05 Thread Dan Carpenter
This is not really an issue with this patch, it's something from the original code so it doesn't affect merging the patch. On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 08:55:47PM +0200, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote: > >Again, reverse the IS_ERR() check and return directly. Use the struct > >pointer instead of the address of

Re: [PATCH] Staging: tidspbridge: Use hashtable implementation

2014-01-02 Thread Dan Carpenter
Minor nits. Nothing major. On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 07:29:52PM +0200, Ivaylo DImitrov wrote: > From: Ivaylo Dimitrov > > Use upstream hashtable implementation instead of generic code > > Signed-off-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov Send from the same email you are using to Sign so we can at least verify th

Re: [PATCH] Staging: tidspbridge: Use hashtable implementation

2013-12-27 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > From: Ivaylo Dimitrov > > Use upstream hashtable implementation instead of generic code > > Signed-off-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov > @@ -991,8 +989,11 @@ static struct dynload_symbol > *dbll_add_to_symbol_table(struct dynamic_loader_sym > sym_ptr = > (struct dbl

[PATCH] Staging: tidspbridge: Use hashtable implementation

2013-12-25 Thread Ivaylo DImitrov
From: Ivaylo Dimitrov Use upstream hashtable implementation instead of generic code Signed-off-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov --- drivers/staging/tidspbridge/gen/gh.c | 141 +++- drivers/staging/tidspbridge/include/dspbridge/gh.h |6 +- drivers/staging/tidspbridge/pmgr/