> >>The 'bad' label will call function that unconditionally dereferences
> >>the NULL pointer.
> >>Found by the Coverity tool
> >>Signed-off-by: Alexander Nyberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Signed-off-by: James Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Err, isn't it "Acked-by:"?? I thought "Signed-off-by:" was only
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 01:32 +0100, Alexander Nyberg wrote:
> The 'bad' label will call function that unconditionally dereferences
> the NULL pointer.
>
> Found by the Coverity tool
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Nyberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Stephen Smalley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Stephen
Kyle Moffett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Err, isn't it "Acked-by:"??
Yes, I usually change it to Acked-by when it's obvious.
Signed-off-by: "I worked on this patch"
Acked-by: "Looks good"
Tested-by: "You're kidding"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-
On Feb 28, 2005, at 23:11, James Morris wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Alexander Nyberg wrote:
The 'bad' label will call function that unconditionally dereferences
the NULL pointer.
Found by the Coverity tool
Signed-off-by: Alexander Nyberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Alexander Nyberg wrote:
> The 'bad' label will call function that unconditionally dereferences
> the NULL pointer.
>
> Found by the Coverity tool
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Nyberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
James Morris
<[EMAI
The 'bad' label will call function that unconditionally dereferences
the NULL pointer.
Found by the Coverity tool
Signed-off-by: Alexander Nyberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
= security/selinux/ss/policydb.c 1.16 vs edited =
--- 1.16/security/selinux/ss/policydb.c 2005-01-15 23:01:45 +01:00
+++ e
6 matches
Mail list logo